max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things

Sat Oct 6 00:17:44 UTC 2012

On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:05:07 -0300, jim deleskie said:

> But here goes, 210x the size of normal really?  210% I'd have a hard
> time believing. Did anyone else anywhere see a route leak equal to
> larger then the entire Internet that day, anywhere else that could of
> caused this?

If the device was only expecting 2K or so internal routes, getting hit with
the 440K routes in the DFZ would be 210x....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20121005/ed5beb5b/attachment.sig>