IPv4 address length technical design
Seth Mos
seth.mos at dds.nl
Wed Oct 3 16:52:57 UTC 2012
Op 3-10-2012 18:33, Kevin Broderick schreef:
> I'll add that in the mid-90's, in a University Of Washington lecture hall, Vint Cerf expressed some regret over going with 32 bits. Chuckle worthy and at the time, and a fond memory
> - K
"Pick a number between this and that." It's the 80's and you can still
count the computers in the world. :)
It is/was a "experiment" and you have the choice between a really large
and a larger number. Humans are not too good in comparing really large
numbers. If it was ever decided to use a smaller value, for the size of
the experiment it might have went quite different. The "safe" (larger)
choice ended up bringing more pain.
As a time honored ritual, the temporary solution becomes the production
solution.
Oops... And that was not quite what Mr Cerf meant to do.
Regards,
Seth
More information about the NANOG
mailing list