William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.

• Previous message (by thread): William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.
• Next message (by thread): William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick at ianai.net>

> "Mere conduit" defense. (Please do not anyone mention "common carrier
> status" or the like, ISPs are _not_ common carriers.)

> Do you think if the police found out child pr0n was being served from
> a starbux they wouldn't confiscate the equipment from that store?

Well, pursuant to the "mere conduit" defense, I believe (IANAL) a defensible
case could be made that the (people operating) Tor nodes are not "servers" as
that term is generally understood in the industry, in the same way that web
browser/caches are not "copies" as IP law understands *that* term.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647 1274

• Previous message (by thread): William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.
• Next message (by thread): William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]