Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

Mikael Abrahamsson swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue Nov 27 04:57:42 UTC 2012


On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Dobbins, Roland wrote:

> Again, all the attention being lavished upon CGNs and 444 and whatnot 
> are quite interesting indicators of perceived priorities.

The problem is that CGN and NAT444 works with todays devices, whereas 
IPv6 does not (thinking mobile devices and residential CPEs).

IPv6 is not today a viable alternative to CGN, one has to do both for a 
while before hopefully devices can do IPv6-only access and one can then 
have a centrally placed NAT64 (or similar) gateway.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se




More information about the NANOG mailing list