Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

Richard Barnes richard.barnes at gmail.com
Mon Nov 26 18:54:48 UTC 2012


On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins at arbor.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:36 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> >
> >> Ipv6 is not important for users, it is important for network operators
> who want to sustain their business.
> >
> > I agree with the first part; not sure I agree with the second part.
> >
> >> Nope. Nobody will leave money on the table by alienating users.
> >
> > I think it may be possible to make money with compelling IPv6-only
> content/services/applications.
> >
>
> I disagree, i simply see an additional fee for IPv4 coming about.


+1

And that in itself seems like it would make IPv6-reachable things a lot
more compelling.



More information about the NANOG mailing list