Adding GPS location to IPv6 header

Mon Nov 26 04:32:45 UTC 2012

I agree, this is entirely unacceptable discourse for nanog.

Maybe you should take a closer look at your Ephesians quote there, Mister 'IPdog.'

-chris

________________________________________
From: Randy [randy_94108 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 20:28
To: Network IPdog
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header

Just because it is from Iraq; does NOT mean by any streach of the imagination that OP is a terrorist!
You need to get outside the box you are living in and learn to separate the forest from the trees!

You are "entitled" to you private-opinions. Don't post said-garbage on NANOG!

I do take exception to such garbage; while other's might not.

./Randy

--- On Sun, 11/25/12, Network IPdog <network.ipdog at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Network IPdog <network.ipdog at gmail.com>
> Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
> To: "'Randy'" <randy_94108 at yahoo.com>
> Date: Sunday, November 25, 2012, 6:43 PM
> The email address is
> from…   auis.edu.iq = Iraq
>
> Sometimes persons living inside the box cannot see the
> forest because of the
> trees.
>
>  PEACE
>
>
> Ephesians 4:32  &  Cheers!!!
>
> A password is like a... toothbrush  ;^)
> Choose a good one, change it regularly and don't share it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy [mailto:randy_94108 at yahoo.com]
>
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 3:52 PM
> To: Network IPdog
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
>
> WHAT???
>
> Is this the extent to which This-List has DEGENERATED???
>
> How dare you make such a horrendous accusation Sir?
>
> You may NOT like what OP has proposed. I don't either for
> more reasons than
> one!
>
> However, YOU are neither qualified NOR authorised to ask
> such an appallingly
> INSENSITIVE Question!
>
> Your so called "Freedom-of-Speech" DOES NOT translate to
> Character-Assasination on this or any other forum!!
>
> Follow me you ipdog? Find you own bitch to abuse. Don't do
> it here!!
>
> ./Randy
>
> --- On Sun, 11/25/12, Network IPdog <network.ipdog at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Network IPdog <network.ipdog at gmail.com>
> > Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
> > To: "'John Adams'" <jna at retina.net>,
> "'Ammar Salih'"
> > <ammar.salih at auis.edu.iq>
> > Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> > Date: Sunday, November 25, 2012, 3:16 PM Et al,
> >
> > There is one simple question that needs to be asked!
> >
> >
> > Ammar Salih @ ammar.salih at auis.edu.iq
> > Are you a terrorist?
> >
> >
> >
> > Ephesians 4:32  &  Cheers!!!
> >
> > A password is like a... toothbrush  ;^) Choose a good
> one, change it
> > regularly and don't share it.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Adams [mailto:jna at retina.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 2:20 PM
> > To: Ammar Salih
> > Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> > list
> > Subject: Re: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
> >
> > Your proposal doesn't even give people a way to encrypt
> their location
> > data; By moving geodata to a portion of the protocol
> which is not
> > covered by commonly used encryption methods (i.e.
> HTTPS, which is up a
> > few layers in the stack) people can't be protected
> should this data be
> > monitored by a malicious intermediary. Think: Syria,
> China, Iran, or
> > any other government which will kill you for your words
> online.
> >
> > Application protocols sending GPS data under say, HTTPS
> protect the
> > end user from revealing their location to anyone on
> their path,
> > forcing an intermediary to look up the IP in a common
> geo database
> > which will be mostly inaccurate in pinpointing users,
> and hopefully
> > will save lives.
> >
> > Companies like Twitter, Facebook, and some parts of
> google are going
> > HTTPS by default for this very reason.
> >
> > This proposal is dead, you don't have the sense to lie
> down.
> >
> >
> >
>
>