Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Wed May 23 02:25:14 UTC 2012


On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Derek Ivey <derek at derekivey.com> wrote:
> Verizon still seems to be quiet about their IPv6 plans for their FiOS
> network too :(.

no they aren't, their complete lack of any noise is their plan.

no plan.

joy.

> On 5/22/2012 10:18 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>>
>> I suppose they are selectively letting certain devices in some areas. I
>> get "der duh, what?" when I ask about it.
>>
>> It certainly does not work on the iPad "3" in Ohio. Not only that, but I
>> can't even pay them to give me a stable IPv4 address, because if you get a
>> static IP, it disables the hotspot functionality. Head-->Wall.
>>
>> thanks,
>> -Randy
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Randy Carpenter
>>> <rcarpen at network1.net>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, they
>>>> also do *not* have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 crap that
>>>> changes your IP address every couple minutes. The only way to get
>>>> a stable connection is to pay them $500 to get a static public IP
>>>> address.
>>>>
>>> wierd, I could swear someone in my office with a galaxy-nexus-on-vzw
>>> was able to browse some ipv6-only sites.
>>>
>>>
>
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list