CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too.

Tue May 1 21:24:23 UTC 2012

On Tue, 01 May 2012 17:16:38 -0400, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:

> P.S. Bill, it is clear you have a point, but you are really stretching
> it.  And it is not relevant to the discussion at hand.

Oh, I dunno.  Double billing 2 customers for development and double billing
2 customers for transporting packets seem related ;)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120501/91e37966/attachment.sig>