$1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms

• Previous message (by thread): $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
• Next message (by thread): $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 24/03/2012 00:32, George Bonser wrote:
> I suggested this once when it was decided that the latency from
> California to the UK was too high and that I should reduce it.  The
> company wouldn't go for it, though.

I assume they had a practical alternative to your proposition?  Perhaps
making light go faster?

Nick

• Previous message (by thread): $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
• Next message (by thread): $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]