shared address space... a reality!

Tim Chown tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Mar 16 07:18:14 UTC 2012


On 15 Mar 2012, at 21:03, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:35:13 PDT, George Herbert said:
>> What, senior network people testing out new test/transitional space at
>> home before they test it at work is bad?
> 
> Either that, or Randy was being snarky about how long the promise to *only* use
> the address space for numbering CGN interfaces and not as additional RFC1918
> space was going to last in reality....

So where is that new /10 leaking to already? ;).

Tim



More information about the NANOG mailing list