Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Masataka Ohta
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Fri Mar 16 00:05:41 UTC 2012
james machado wrote:
>> For high speed (fixed time) routed look up with 1M entries, SRAM is
>> cheap at /24 and is fine at /32 but expensive and power consuming
>> TCAM is required at /48.
>>
>> That's one reason why we should stay away from IPv6.
> I found this bit of research from 2007 (
> http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~wlu/papers/tcam.pdf ). It seems to me there
> are probably more ways to mix and match different types of ram to be
> able to deal with this beast.
But it's not fixed time.
Worse, it synthesis IPv6 table from the current IPv4 ones, which
means the number of routing table entries is a lot less than 1M.
Masataka Ohta
More information about the NANOG
mailing list