Questions about anycasting setup

Fri Mar 9 09:08:48 UTC 2012

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Mar 9, 2012, at 12:11 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> Well, let's say, using Quagga/BIRD might not really be best practice for
> everybody... (e.g., *we* are using Cisco equipment for this)

How does your Cisco know whether an adjacent nameserver is heavily loaded, and adjust its BGP announcements accordingly?

                                -Bill

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=Ltey
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----