Programmers with network engineering skills

Tei oscar.vives at gmail.com
Wed Mar 7 12:06:44 UTC 2012


On 27 February 2012 23:23, Jay Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com>
>
>> I think you're more likely to find a network engineer with (possibly
>> limited) programming skills.
>>
>> That's certainly where I would categorize myself.
>
> And you're the first I've seen suggest, or even imply, that going that
> direction instead might be more fruitful; seemed to me that the skills
> necessary to make a decent network engineer would support learning
> programming better than the other way round -- though in fact I personally
> did it the other way.

I agree.  And I am just a programmer.

Part of it, is that our job is to obscure implementation details to
these in higuer levels.  We think hard to build stuff, so other people
don't have to.  If theres a program that create a conexion, and that
conexion can break, we silently repeat the re-conexion part, so these
that use the program ignore these problems and can live happy.   A bad
programmer will show a message "Conexion break, please connect again".
 Having the human manually pressing the "connect" button again. I have
no words for how lame is that.
So we hide implementation details for us, and for others.  Programmers
that write compilers hide implementation details to others.  Designers
of CPU's microcode hide implementation details to mere assembler
programmers.

-- 
--
ℱin del ℳensaje.




More information about the NANOG mailing list