Common operational misconceptions

Sat Mar 3 08:33:49 UTC 2012

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Michael Sinatra
<michael at rancid.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> ULA is the IPv6 equivalent of RFC1918

Michael, could you explain this a bit more? In the sense that :

a. Anyone can use ULA pretty much as they wish without having to go to
their ISP or RIR - same for RFC1918
b. In order to get to the public Internet, with ULA addressing, some
kind of translation is required - same for RFC1918
c. Without centralised registration, two different networks could end
up using same ULA space -  same for RFC1918

There are certainly not identical but I'd think loosely equivalent.
What am I missing?

>

-- 
Mukom Akong [Tamon]
______________

“We don't LIVE in order to BREATH. Similarly WORKING in order to make
MONEY puts us on a one way street to irrelevance.“

[In Search of Excellence & Perfection] - http://perfexcellence.org
[Moments of TechXcellence] - http://techexcellence.net
[ICT Business Integration] - http://ibiztech.wordpress.com
[About Me] - http://about.me/perfexcellence