IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links)

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Mon Jun 25 18:26:14 UTC 2012


On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Douglas Otis <dotis at mail-abuse.org> wrote:
> The Internet should use more than port 80 and port 443.  Is extending
> entrenched TCP cruft really taking the Internet to a better and safer
> place?

isn't the 'internet should use more than 80/443' really: "Some
compelling use case should be found for more than 2 ports" ? Or
perhaps more clearly: "What application is written that is getting
wide appeal and uses more than 80/443?"

(aside from edonkey which Arbor always shows as a huge user of bandwidth)

-chris
(btw, it would be nice to use more ports, if there are applications
and users of said applications that want to do that...)




More information about the NANOG mailing list