Simple Peering Agreement

Fri Jun 15 18:55:22 UTC 2012

http://gogonetlive.com/pdf/gogonet_live2/chris_grundemann.pdf

--- On Fri, 6/15/12, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:


From: Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net>
Subject: Re: Simple Peering Agreement
To: "NANOG (nanog at nanog.org)" <nanog at nanog.org>
Date: Friday, June 15, 2012, 7:57 PM


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


On Jun 15, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Isabel Dias wrote:
> are you any good in Maths?
> http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Advances%20in%20Routing%20Technologies%20and%20Internet%20Peering%20Agr.%202001.pdf

If you're good in maths, you'll realize that the simple peering agreement is the one that covers 99.5% of interconnections, and is well enough understood that it need not be committed to paper.  :-)

http://www.pch.net/resources/papers/peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-2011.pdf

                                -Bill


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=lm/u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----