Simple Peering Agreement

Fri Jun 15 18:10:14 UTC 2012

	I need paperwork to justify several things the bean counters want to see
on paper.  It's hard to present why you need 5 additional 10Gig ports when
you have nothing on paper of why those ports are being used.

	Justin


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net>
Date: Friday, June 15, 2012 1:57 PM
To: "NANOG (nanog at nanog.org)" <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Simple Peering Agreement

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA256
>
>
>On Jun 15, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Isabel Dias wrote:
>> are you any good in Maths?
>> 
>>http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Advances%20in%20Routin
>>g%20Technologies%20and%20Internet%20Peering%20Agr.%202001.pdf
>
>If you're good in maths, you'll realize that the simple peering agreement
>is the one that covers 99.5% of interconnections, and is well enough
>understood that it need not be committed to paper.  :-)
>
>http://www.pch.net/resources/papers/peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-2011
>.pdf
>
>                                -Bill
>
>
>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
>Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
>iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP23eFAAoJEG+kcEsoi3+HSJ8P+wTeik0+xr1o5R8hTVsCKsrI
>+xwxAOzE5yjt8MXqAKqOWCFqWBWy1xaXcetUiKW/0SKjK+5Uz2OVUsPHnDc6xX/k
>clhM5b2rsB7T5NkRzBO26kfCMXEAL1v9peafxzc3XWjXuOtbf6UnBwH6+OIgiLrM
>+1Sbj/fVI/CwFYhpRRPW77itttfS6srka5uz06vB0XN69VQ7mn/bESOChaypf31K
>Vn3MZhn6byCVDcyrEOH5QtK5DAW1EQrZLbZA9e6VwrrartSjiwP9N9QuVGZ0fXhr
>uKnlQwxJXX1z/hC1REQcYLN4yuRcEFvKJj1t/3yuOoA00TvWZyYiKtzdTnUNmK5c
>BFPImwyod/X0qZHTfzik+dIHbO5vlS31jL/I4xmKn5PYKjNXSODx4viN+C39Je+r
>IR07ppVUv8du4cwDzxDVldFuT8HGv3X3fS5NI1iJUiJFqD5fR/6y1E4EOhGZkVa3
>DI1WwEcSS/mJiW0BgHhuWmHAK++mXANP8qKWZcVNmP7BDwJ8hUKg4tltepVkyvUp
>VyPc4vOns/06TvEM3F8i2nCuCxDxhftsvHnGepYijvSPko25NDCOE5g2VBlITCf2
>neGZ8xttsnTiAqGG5oHYsMWyMg1kjodGHMR2oBzPeNUTUMyOJFM2Ro8TfDvX9b1/
>43LgwdG9N3ExiUpAmKcO
>=lm/u
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>