IPv6 day and tunnels

Templin, Fred L Fred.L.Templin at boeing.com
Tue Jun 12 21:26:58 UTC 2012


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masataka Ohta [mailto:mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 2:12 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Owen DeLong; nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 day and tunnels
> 
> Templin, Fred L wrote:
> 
> >> As I already said, 9KB is fine for me.
> >
> > Then you will agree that accommodation of MTU diversity
> > is a MUST (my point).
> 
> Not necessarily, as IPv4 can take care of itself and IPv6
> is hopeless.

IPv4 can take care of it how - with broken PMTUD or
with broken fragmentation/reassembly? And, you won't
get any argument from me that IPv6 has been stuck
for years for good reasons - but MTU failures can
soon be taken off the list.

Fred
fred.l.templin at boeing.com 




More information about the NANOG mailing list