IPv6 day and tunnels

Templin, Fred L Fred.L.Templin at boeing.com
Tue Jun 12 12:19:39 CDT 2012

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masataka Ohta [mailto:mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 4:47 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Owen DeLong; nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 day and tunnels
> Templin, Fred L wrote:
> > If you wish, you can also consider Alternate 3 for 9kB:
> > 72us at 1Gbps, 7.2us at 10Gbps, .72us at 100Gbps, .072us at 1Tbps.
> So?
> Have you learned enough about Moore's law that, at 10Gbps
> era, 72us of delay is often significant?

I frankly haven't thought about it any further. You say
1280+ belongs in ITU, and I say 1280- belongs in ATM.
Larger packets means fewer interrupts and fewer packets
in flight, which is good Moore's law or no. Accommodation
of MTU diversity is what matters.

fred.l.templin at boeing.com

> 						Masataka Ohta

More information about the NANOG mailing list