Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
trejrco at gmail.com
Thu Jul 19 01:35:59 UTC 2012
Even if they did OK it (which i doubt), actually using it - especially in a
public/customer facing / visible deployment - is a Bad Idea.
*Traceability fail and possibly creating unreachable networks out there ...*
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Andrey Khomyakov <
khomyakov.andrey at gmail.com> wrote:
> So some "comments" on the intertubes claim that DoD ok'd use of it's
> unadvertized space on private networks. Is there any official reference
> that may support this statement that anyone of you have seen out there?
More information about the NANOG