using "reserved" IPv6 space

Doug Barton dougb at
Tue Jul 17 17:49:27 UTC 2012

On 7/17/2012 5:47 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> I wonder who really believes there is no usage case for NAT66. Have these
> people seen non-trivial corporate networks?
> I'm sure many people in this list finance part of their lives with renumber
> projects costing MUSDs. For many companies just finding out where addresses
> have been punched in (your FWs, your software, partner FWs, partner
> software, configurations...) will take months, before even starting
> renumbering.

For those with PA space should be a
good solution.


    If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough

More information about the NANOG mailing list