using "reserved" IPv6 space

-Hammer- bhmccie at
Sat Jul 14 20:14:45 UTC 2012

    The whole purpose of this is that they do NOT need to be global.
Security thru obscurity. It actually has a place in some worlds. Does that
make sense? Or are such V4-centric approaches a bad thing in v6?

On 7/13/12 8:41 PM, "Brandon Ross" <bross at> wrote:

>On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> On Jul 13, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> keep life simple.  use global ipv6 space.
>>> randy
>> Though it is rare, this is one time when I absolutely agree with Randy.
>It's even more rare for me to agree with Randy AND Owen at the same time.
>Brandon Ross                                      Yahoo & AIM:
>+1-404-635-6667                                                ICQ:
>Schedule a meeting:             Skype:

More information about the NANOG mailing list