Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!)
jbates at brightok.net
Fri Jul 13 16:46:04 UTC 2012
On 6/5/2012 9:29 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Looking more closely... Is this still work in progress?
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> comcast.net. 358 IN MX 5 mx3.comcast.net.
> comcast.net. 358 IN MX 10 mx1.comcast.net.
> comcast.net. 358 IN MX 5 mx2.comcast.net.
> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> mx2.comcast.net. 6958 IN A 220.127.116.11
> mx3.comcast.net. 358 IN A 18.104.22.168
> mx1.comcast.net. 358 IN AAAA 2001:558:fe14:70::22
> You are now only accepting IPv6 if all IPv4 fails?
> Or will AAAA records for mx2 and mx3 added later?
Actually, I've had a problem with my version of sendmail on solaris
choosing mx1.comcast.net and then reporting host not found. I think this
is an issue with address selection, despite the server not being setup
for v6 (os/sendmail are set for v6 support, but no assignment). I can't
think of another reason why it would bounce 800+ emails with
relay=mx1.comcast.net but have 0 logs for mx2/mx3.
More information about the NANOG