10G switchrecommendaton

Alvaro Pereira starthir at gmail.com
Sun Jan 29 16:02:28 CST 2012


And note that the Juniper EX2500 does not run JUNOS, it is just an OEM box
from someone else...

Alvaro

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:23, Tim Vollebregt <tim at interworx.nl> wrote:

> 2,5MB shared approximately.
>
> Aggregating 10G with microbursts is definately a no-go on such box.
>
> -Tim
>
>
> On 27-01-12 12:33, James Braunegg wrote:
>
>> How small is the buffer on the EX4500 ??
>>
>> Kindest Regards
>>
>> James Braunegg
>> W:  1300 769 972  |  M:  0488 997 207 |  D:  (03) 9751 7616
>> E:   james.braunegg at micron21.com  |  ABN:  12 109 977 666
>>
>>
>> This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain
>> privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
>> recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it
>> to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message in
>> error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then
>> delete the message from your computer.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tim Vollebregt [mailto:tim at interworx.nl]
>> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:35 PM
>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
>>
>> I would not recommend EX4500 as an 10G aggregator switch, it has really
>> small buffers.
>>
>> EX3300 as TOR
>> EX82** as 10G aggregator
>>
>> -Tim
>>
>> On 26-01-12 22:13, Raul Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>>> Juniper EX4500.
>>>
>>> -RR
>>>
>>> On 1/26/12, Deric Kwok<deric.kwok2000 at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test
>>>> around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port!
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>


More information about the NANOG mailing list