drew.weaver at thenap.com
Fri Jan 27 07:53:51 CST 2012
I would like to point out that in my experience if you do a lot of coding/devops/automation work with SNMP extreme is a lot harder to work with than Cisco and some of their OIDs/MIBs produce unusual results.
From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey123 at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 3:54 AM
To: Erik Bais
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
I have experience with the Extreme's Alpine, Blackdiamond, x250, and x450 and i discovered that the command line is fairly different than Cisco, HP, or Dell. However, since they are a relatively small company with a small but strong customer base, their support is fairly good. I can't speak for 10G/40G implementations, but from my experiences, they support has a quick response time and they do quite a bit of lab replication to figure out the exact root cause.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Erik Bais <ebais at a2b-internet.com> wrote:
> We have a full purple network, so my answer for this would be Extreme
> Check out the Lipis report on the X670 / x670v 48 port 10G 1U switches.
> vs other vendor equipment :
> Erik Bais
> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> Op Jan 26, 2012 om 21:20 heeft Deric Kwok <deric.kwok2000 at gmail.com>
> het volgende geschreven:
> > Hi all
> > I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test
> > around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port!
> > Thank you
More information about the NANOG