fdelmotte1 at mac.com
Fri Jan 27 04:19:33 CST 2012
I worked for Extreme, and I deployed a lot of X650 (24 10G ports) for DataCenter environment. The box is really good.
In fact if you use the box at a layer 2 it is perfect, BUT DON'T use their BGP code, they never understood what is BGP :)
Le 27 janv. 2012 à 09:54, Grant Ridder a écrit :
> I have experience with the Extreme's Alpine, Blackdiamond, x250, and x450
> and i discovered that the command line is fairly different than Cisco, HP,
> or Dell. However, since they are a relatively small company with a small
> but strong customer base, their support is fairly good. I can't speak for
> 10G/40G implementations, but from my experiences, they support has a quick
> response time and they do quite a bit of lab replication to figure out the
> exact root cause.
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Erik Bais <ebais at a2b-internet.com> wrote:
>> We have a full purple network, so my answer for this would be Extreme
>> Check out the Lipis report on the X670 / x670v 48 port 10G 1U switches.
>> vs other vendor equipment :
>> Erik Bais
>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> Op Jan 26, 2012 om 21:20 heeft Deric Kwok <deric.kwok2000 at gmail.com> het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>> Hi all
>>> I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton
>>> Ipref software can test around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G
>>> in single port!
>>> Thank you
More information about the NANOG