using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?

Nick Hilliard nick at
Wed Jan 25 16:28:13 UTC 2012

On 25/01/2012 16:15, Dale W. Carder wrote:
> I believe there is no need to replicate the headaches of rfc1918 in the
> next address-family eternity.

I wish you luck selling this notion to enterprise network people, most of
who appear to believe that rfc1918 address space is a feature, not a bug.


More information about the NANOG mailing list