Why not to use RPKI (Was Re: Argus: a hijacking alarm system)

Yang Xiang xiangy08 at csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn
Mon Jan 23 21:43:23 CST 2012


2012/1/24 John Kemp <kemp at network-services.uoregon.edu>
>
>
> Minor correction there.  If you are talking about our IX collectors
> (LINX, PAIX,
> EQIX Ashburn, SYDNEY, etc.) those are at exchanges and peering
> directly.  The
> collectors at Univ of Oregon (rv,rv2,rv3,rv4, rv6), yeah, those are
> multi-hop.
> Doesn't detract from your point, but I think it helps if people are
> aware of whether
> they are on the exchange or on a multihop when using routeviews collectors.
>
We talk about routeservers, not collectors.
Argus doesn't use routeservers in RouteViews to identify hijacking.


>
> Only other thing to add, I don't think anyone mentioned Cyclops in this
> thread.
> Just as another data point, see also: http://cyclops.6watch.net or
> http://cyclops.cs.ucla.edu
>
> John Kemp (kemp at routeviews.org)
>
>
-- 
_________________________________________
Yang Xiang. Ph.D candidate. Tsinghua University
Argus: argus.csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn


More information about the NANOG mailing list