Re: seized

[email protected] james at
Thu Jan 19 23:53:42 UTC 2012

Wow, what suprised the servers were, all located offshore.

Sent from my HTC

----- Reply message -----
From: "Paul Graydon" <paul at>
To: <nanog at>
Subject: seized
Date: Thu, Jan 19, 2012 7:27 pm

On 01/19/2012 12:41 PM, Ryan Gelobter wrote:
> The domain was seized today, has anyone noticed significant
> drops in network traffic as a result?
Ars Technica are implying it was quite a source of bandwidth usage within companies.  I'm curious, are any interesting charts on an ISP side? 

More information about the NANOG mailing list