juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000
ariel at post.tau.ac.il
Thu Jan 19 15:43:34 CST 2012
On 01/19/2012 11:40 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jon Heise [mailto:jon at smugmug.com]
>> Sent: 19 January 2012 21:37
>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>> Subject: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000
>> Does anyone have any experience with these two routers, we're looking
>> to buy one of them but i have little experience dealing with cisco
>> routers and zero experience with juniper.
> I have lots of MX80s and they have all been fantastic. But if you have no experience of Juniper it will be a different learning curve (one that is, IMO, worth the effort).
> I have not used the asr1000 but it looks like a capable box. You would do well to look at the MX80 fixed chassis, it comes with 48 1G interfaces and 4 10G interfaces. They are pretty good value, I think.
It well depends on your requirements (not talking about throughput).
The ASR1000 series is a "services" box. It does more in terms of
services (using license enablers) than the MX80 does, and it costs
So, it very much depends on what you want to do with the boxes.
> Leigh Porter
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
e-mail: ariel at post.tau.ac.il
More information about the NANOG