RIS raw data
randy at psg.com
Thu Jan 19 15:34:49 CST 2012
> Please don't conflate the policy mechanisms enabled by the IRR policy
> *language*/specification itself with the *data* contained in the IRR
i don't. the former is called rpsl.
>> some years back, i asked for a *simple minimal* tagging of announcements
>> to route views, just peer, customer, internal. it got ietfed to utter
>> uselessness, with more crap welded on to it than envisioned in mad max.
> Wrt your last paragraph: care to share a link the I-D (or, RFC) that
> you allude to above?
> I think your last paragraph is alluding to tagging routes with
> standard BGP communities, based on your "simple minimal" criteria,
> before they are sent to route-views. That strikes me as potentially
> orthogonal to issues with the present data in the IRR.
but not orthogonal to the op's direct question.
More information about the NANOG