Monday Night Footbal -- on Google?
cb.list6 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 15 15:51:18 CST 2012
On Jan 15, 2012 1:40 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> > Unfortunately that does exactly nothing to help with Internet scale.
> > Now scaling for your local environment embedded RP might be beneficial,
> > actual practical applications where you need ASM are very few.
> Most vendors took out hardware multicast support and do it via
> these days.
> I'm more interested in other topics, this would likely be served by a CDN,
> and I'm curious if any CDNs have started placing gear behind CGN/LSN.
CDNs have shown hesitation to receiving traffic from non-unique ipv4 space
despite the obvious benefits of CGN bypass.
> I've also noticed some hotels and other 'guest net' folks capturing
> and comparable open recursive name servers in-house. Two weeks ago I
> 22.214.171.124 and get responses when TTL was set to 1 on my outgoing packets.
> - Jared
More information about the NANOG