Monday Night Footbal -- on Google?

Cameron Byrne cb.list6 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 15 15:51:18 CST 2012


On Jan 15, 2012 1:40 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 15, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately that does exactly nothing to help with Internet scale.
> >
> > Now scaling for your local environment embedded RP might be beneficial,
but
> > actual practical applications where you need ASM are very few.
> >
>
> Most vendors took out hardware multicast support and do it via
recirculation
> these days.
>
> I'm more interested in other topics, this would likely be served by a CDN,
> and I'm curious if any CDNs have started placing gear behind CGN/LSN.
>

CDNs have shown hesitation to receiving traffic from non-unique ipv4 space
despite the obvious benefits of CGN bypass.

Cb

> I've also noticed some hotels and other 'guest net' folks capturing
4.2.2.1
> and comparable open recursive name servers in-house.  Two weeks ago I
could ping
> 4.2.2.1 and get responses when TTL was set to 1 on my outgoing packets.
>
> - Jared


More information about the NANOG mailing list