incoming smtp from v6 addresses
berni at birkenwald.de
Fri Jan 6 13:16:50 CST 2012
Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like
> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 18.104.22.168 listed in rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org
> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [22.214.171.124] F=<pedrom at nexo.es> rejected RCPT <owner-radiusext at ops.ietf.org>: blocked because 126.96.36.199 is in blacklist at rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org: Mail from 188.8.131.52 blocked using Trend Micro Email Reputation database. Please see <http://www.mail-abuse.com/cgi-bin/lookup?184.108.40.206>
> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 no host name found for IP address 220.127.116.11
> 2012-01-04 00:37:29 REJECT 18.104.22.168 too many bad recip
> 2012-01-04 00:37:29 REJECT because 22.214.171.124 listed in rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org
> 7.8% is over ipv6 transport
> but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6.
> what do other folk see?
Main inbound MX for a large educational institution sees around 5% of
mails coming in via IPv6. Might be a bit biased due to holiday season.
Outbound is mostly running on legacy servers without IPv6, yet :-(
More information about the NANOG