Common operational misconceptions
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Mon Feb 20 21:37:07 CST 2012
George Bonser wrote:
> I, in fact, HAVE read the RFC.
You don't, at all.
> The initial value for search_high SHOULD be the largest possible
> packet that might be supported by the flow. This may be limited by
> the local interface MTU, by an explicit protocol mechanism such as
> the TCP MSS option, or by an intrinsic limit such as the size of a
> protocol length field.
It is a section on "search_high", while your question in your
previous mail was on "eff_pmtu":
>> First, it sets eff_pmtu to 1400B. OK?
> Where did you get 1400 from?
Note that rest of your mail also contains a lot of
misunderstandings on the RFC. But, as you don't read
the RFC, collecting them is a waste of time.
Read the RFC thoroughly again and again, 10 times a day
for 30 days. Then, I may reply your further questions if
asked off list.
More information about the NANOG