Sonicwall 3500/netflow
Brandon Kim
brandon.kim at brandontek.com
Tue Feb 14 16:13:39 UTC 2012
Never messed around with Juniper....
> From: leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com
> To: brandon.kim at brandontek.com; blake at pfankuch.me; jay at miscreant.org; jra at baylink.com
> CC: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 +0000
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon.kim at brandontek.com]
> > Sent: 14 February 2012 15:51
> > To: blake at pfankuch.me; jay at miscreant.org; jra at baylink.com
> > Cc: nanog group
> > Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
> >
> >
> > I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for the CLI, yes it
> > is CLUNKY.
> >
> > But they are completely revamping it, it will be very similar to Cisco
> > in the near future...
>
> Why do people like to base their CLIs on the really rather awful Cisco style interface rather than something with some more structure like Juniper?
>
>
> --
> Leigh Porter
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
More information about the NANOG
mailing list