Sonicwall 3500/netflow

Brandon Kim brandon.kim at brandontek.com
Tue Feb 14 10:13:39 CST 2012


Never messed around with Juniper....




> From: leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com
> To: brandon.kim at brandontek.com; blake at pfankuch.me; jay at miscreant.org; jra at baylink.com
> CC: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 +0000
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon.kim at brandontek.com]
> > Sent: 14 February 2012 15:51
> > To: blake at pfankuch.me; jay at miscreant.org; jra at baylink.com
> > Cc: nanog group
> > Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
> > 
> > 
> > I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for the CLI, yes it
> > is CLUNKY.
> > 
> > But they are completely revamping it, it will be very similar to Cisco
> > in the near future...
> 
> Why do people like to base their CLIs on the really rather awful Cisco style interface rather than something with some more structure like Juniper?
> 
> 
> --
> Leigh Porter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
 		 	   		  


More information about the NANOG mailing list