William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.
brandon at bitradius.com
Tue Dec 18 04:10:50 UTC 2012
In any event, I'm pretty sure that I'd rather get hit with "tampering with
evidence" versus them retrieving data that may incriminate me. I believe
this may be a the "lesser of two evils" game.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyle Creyts [mailto:kyle.creyts at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 2:52 PM
> To: Jeroen van Aart
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please
> help if you can.
> In most jurisdictions, wouldn't using a de-gaussing ring in the door
> frame to wipe any equipment being removed constitute "tampering with
> evidence" or interfering with an investigation if the authority in
> question is in possession of a warrant/subpoena?
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jeroen van Aart <jeroen at mompl.net>
> > On 11/30/2012 02:02 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
> >> OK, there must be a lot more paranoid people out there than I
> > for awhile? I am sure he will let you out to go to the bank, get
> > your
> >> stuff, and leave town. I think you have seen way to many movies.
> > So if the cops show up at his door tomorrow and say "Here's all your
> >> stuff back, there was no evidence of a crime.", you are OK with this
> >> guys keeping the "defense fund"?
> > I for one vote for installing a de-gauging ring in your door frame.
> > any removal of equipment you don't approve of will be wiped. That and
> > encryption possibly combined with hiding the "real" OS (truecrypt can
> > do that).
> > Greetings,
> > Jeroen
> > --
> > Earthquake Magnitude: 5.1
> > Date: Monday, December 17, 2012 17:46:48 UTC
> > Location: central East Pacific Rise
> > Latitude: -3.9682; Longitude: -104.0375
> > Depth: 15.70 km
> Kyle Creyts
> Information Assurance Professional
> BSidesDetroit Organizer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2739 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the NANOG