TCP time_wait and port exhaustion for servers
mpalmer at hezmatt.org
Fri Dec 7 21:51:02 UTC 2012
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 08:58:10AM -0500, Ray Soucy wrote:
> > net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_intvl = 15
> > net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_probes = 3
> > net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time = 90
> > net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout = 30
> As discussed, those do not affect TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN.
> There is a lot of misinformation out there on this subject so please
> don't just Google for 5 min. and chime in with a "solution" that you
> haven't verified yourself.
> We can expand the ephemeral port range to be a full 60K (and we have
> as a band-aid), but that only delays the issue as use grows. I can
> verify that changing it via:
> echo 1025 65535 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
> Does work for the full range, as a spot check shows ports as low as
> 2000 and as high as 64000 being used.
I can attest to the effectiveness of this method, however be sure and add
any ports in that range that you use as incoming ports for services to
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports, otherwise the first time you
restart a service that uses a high port (*cough*NRPE*cough*), its port will
probably get snarfed for an outgoing connection and then you're in a sad,
[An ad for Microsoft] uses the musical theme of the "Confutatis Maledictis"
from Mozart's Requiem. "Where do you want to go today?" is on the screen,
while the chorus sings "Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis,".
Translation: "The damned and accursed are convicted to the flames of hell."
More information about the NANOG