HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame
owen at delong.com
Mon Aug 20 15:31:42 CDT 2012
VRRP is to HSRP what 802.1q is to ISL...
I highly recommend using VRRP instead of HSRP because:
1. It is a more robust protocol
2. It is vendor agnostic
3. Being vendor agnostic it is more likely to have a continuing future.
Does anyone still use ISL?
On Aug 20, 2012, at 13:10 , sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
>> Yeah I see the disconnect. I'm assuming that what I see is what I get.
>> Which means I'm going to stick with HSRP. If our AS team gives me any
>> good feedback that I can share I will do so. Thanks Nick.
>> XE: v4: HSRPv1, HSRPv2, VRRP v6: HSRPv2
> Not particularly relevant to the original question - however, I'd like
> to mention that we've been using IPv6 VRRP on our Juniper routers for
> well over a year. No particular problems so far.
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
More information about the NANOG