DNS Changer items

valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
Wed Aug 15 13:34:08 CDT 2012


On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:51:32 -0400, Randy Whitney said:

> Perhaps it should not have been re-allocated at all, rather than cause
> the unsuspecting allocatee trouble they would not have seen from
> clean(er) space.

"unsuspecting"??!?

You want a clean prefix, get some IPv6 space instead.  Anybody who is
getting IPv4 space in 2012 and doesn't realize that they're getting "scraping
the bottom of the barrel" quality prefixes will get what they deserve for
not doing their due diligence (i.e. paying attention the last decade or so).

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120815/2e11588a/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list