next hop packet loss
Tom Hill
tom at ninjabadger.net
Mon Aug 6 21:50:43 UTC 2012
Hi Jim,
On 06/08/12 22:27, Jim Ray wrote:
> What is the best way to solve this type of problem?
It's not a problem, it's checkpoint purporting to be 'secure' when all
they're doing is blocking ICMP outright, seemingly.
If I try 'tcptraceroute' (from Linux) it works just fine, bare the
Above.net hop in the middle that doesn't respond - ignore.
$ sudo tcptraceroute -n checkpoint.com
traceroute to checkpoint.com (216.200.241.66), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 81.187.203.81 0.719 ms 1.050 ms 1.298 ms
2 90.155.53.54 30.184 ms 31.604 ms 32.370 ms
3 90.155.53.43 33.891 ms 35.072 ms 36.021 ms
4 85.91.238.217 37.016 ms 38.236 ms 39.215 ms
5 85.91.224.10 40.226 ms 41.358 ms 42.354 ms
6 212.187.200.145 164.713 ms 164.102 ms 164.020 ms
7 4.69.139.99 45.316 ms 194.042 ms 194.088 ms
8 64.125.14.17 194.297 ms 193.943 ms 193.558 ms
9 64.125.31.198 194.304 ms 194.462 ms 193.560 ms
10 * * *
11 64.125.26.37 288.267 ms 284.237 ms 166.340 ms
12 64.125.24.38 178.571 ms 179.467 ms 156.769 ms
13 64.125.28.238 148.002 ms 147.244 ms 147.501 ms
14 64.125.26.141 206.010 ms 205.574 ms 205.426 ms
15 64.125.28.57 201.753 ms 172.439 ms 174.169 ms
16 64.124.201.230 176.866 ms 172.412 ms 172.510 ms
17 208.185.174.208 173.668 ms 174.310 ms 173.999 ms
18 216.200.241.66 <syn,ack> 172.504 ms 172.386 ms 172.700 ms
Tom
More information about the NANOG
mailing list