rpki vs. secure dns?
dburk at burkov.aha.ru
Mon Apr 30 10:16:10 CDT 2012
just one more comment.
So named vendor's support can be the worst case when there are no practical ways to deploy and it is absolutely
not clear - should we follow this hierarchical model - I think it is the key point as we pushed ourselves by inertia to this way of thinking.
Imho - it is way to nowhere in such form
We need more flexible, distributed architecture behind - no matter - which interests will be lobbied as we have got already.
On Apr 30, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2012, at 6:34 AM, Alex Band wrote:
>> All in all, RPKI has really good traction and with native router support in Cisco, Juniper and Quagga, this is only getting better.
> We should be more careful with statements such as this, they're conflating important things that add to the confusion in this area.
> None of these implementations support "RPKI" today. What they support is a new protocol for onboarding routing policy data (some call this a [VRP], essentially prefix,origin bindings) into soft state in a router.
> [VRP] https://ripe64.ripe.net/presentations/74-120417.sidr-origin.pdf
More information about the NANOG