Squeezing IPs out of ARIN

William Herrin bill at herrin.us
Thu Apr 26 20:14:55 CDT 2012


On 4/26/12, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
>> It is unreasonable to require detailed customer information on /32 static
>> assignments which make up the smallest fraction of space compared to the
>> huge blocks of dhcp pools (pools which justify allocations on their own).
>> In addition, a few show commands on a router displaying arp (with first 6
>> filtered) or ppp sessions (with username filtered) or dhcp pool printouts
>> showing utilization would make much more sense and provide better "proof"
>> of utilization then handing out private resident names of the <10% static
>> /32 utilization pool.
>
> /32s are not required. Get over it.

Hi Owen,

John Curran says otherwise.

http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2012-April/024518.html
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2012-April/024523.html

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



More information about the NANOG mailing list