IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE
PC
paul4004 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 21:19:25 UTC 2012
He.net tunnels are also good to have because depending on your provider,
there's still many with incomplete views of the ipv6 routing table and he
might have a path. This is a more prevalent issue with ipv6 than v4 at the
moment.
On Apr 11, 2012 2:03 PM, "Anurag Bhatia" <me at anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
> Hi Seth
>
>
> I just did a test from Eu based server sitting below EU based HE Tunnel
> node by downloading Ubuntu release file from US based server. This does not
> tells about possible high speed but surely tells what is available atleast.
> Server itself is sitting on M-Online with 100Mbps pipe.
>
>
>
>
> IPv4:
>
> traceroute to mirror.anl.gov (146.137.96.7), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> 1 gw.giga-dns.com (91.194.90.1) [AS51167] 16.876 ms 16.925 ms 16.915
> ms
> 2 host-93-104-204-33.customer.m-online.net (93.104.204.33) [AS8767]
> 1.166 ms 1.449 ms 1.445 ms
> 3 xe-2-1-0.rt-decix-1.m-online.net (212.18.6.162) [AS8767] 8.889 ms
> 8.888 ms 8.880 ms
> 4 20gigabitethernet4-3.core1.fra1.he.net (80.81.192.172) [AS6695]
> 18.586
> ms 19.831 ms 19.824 ms
> 5 10gigabitethernet1-4.core1.par2.he.net (184.105.213.162) [AS6939]
> 18.794 ms 18.789 ms 10gigabitethernet2-2.core1.par2.he.net (72.52.92.26)
> [AS6939] 18.437 ms
> 6 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.par2.he.net (184.105.213.90) [AS6939]
> 18.507 ms 10gigabitethernet7-1.core1.ash1.he.net (184.105.213.93)
> [AS6939]
> 96.880 ms 97.345 ms
> 7 esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18) [AS6939]
> 95.544 ms 10gigabitethernet7-1.core1.ash1.he.net (184.105.213.93)
> [AS6939]
> 97.616 ms esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18)
> [AS6939] 95.354 ms
> 8 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 97.835 ms
> esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18) [AS6939]
> 95.727
> ms washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 98.492 ms
> 9 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 98.463 ms
> washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (134.55.220.54) [AS293] 110.668 ms 110.641
> ms
> 10 starsdn1-ip-washsdn2.es.net (134.55.218.65) [AS293] 120.357 ms
> 120.844 ms washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (134.55.220.54) [AS293] 110.834
> ms
> 11 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (134.55.219.25) [AS293] 164.788 ms
> 164.548
> ms 164.550 ms
> 12 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (134.55.219.25) [AS293] 164.758 ms
> anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (134.55.219.53) [AS293] 128.288 ms 128.286 ms
> 13 guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.532 ms
> anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (134.55.219.53) [AS293] 128.263 ms
> guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.500 ms
> 14 * guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.687 ms
> 117.858 ms
> 15 * * *
> 16 * * *
> 17 * * *
> 18 * * *
>
>
> root at server7:/home/anurag/tmp# wget -4
>
> http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
> --2012-04-11 21:56:46--
>
> http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
> Resolving mirror.anl.gov... 146.137.96.7
> Connecting to mirror.anl.gov|146.137.96.7|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 1644474368 (1.5G) [application/octet-stream]
> Saving to: `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso.1'
>
>
> 100%[============================================================================================================================>]
> 1,644,474,368 4.78M/s in 5m 38s
>
> 2012-04-11 22:02:25 (4.64 MB/s) - `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso.1' saved
> [1644474368/1644474368]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> IPv6:
>
>
> traceroute to mirror.anl.gov (2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9), 30 hops
> max, 80 byte packets
> 1 2001:470:25:78f::1 (2001:470:25:78f::1) [AS6939] 18.918 ms 21.147 ms
> 23.357 ms
> 2 gige-g2-20.core1.zrh1.he.net (2001:470:0:11d::1) [AS6939] 23.341 ms
> 23.324 ms 23.797 ms
> 3 10gigabitethernet5-1.core1.fra1.he.net (2001:470:0:21c::1) [AS6939]
> 29.781 ms 30.252 ms 23.671 ms
> 4 10gigabitethernet5-3.core1.lon1.he.net (2001:470:0:1d2::1) [AS6939]
> 37.897 ms 37.880 ms 43.095 ms
> 5 10gigabitethernet7-4.core1.nyc4.he.net (2001:470:0:128::1) [AS6939]
> 104.552 ms 105.763 ms 105.742 ms
> 6 10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.ash1.he.net (2001:470:0:36::1) [AS6939]
> 113.963 ms 114.467 ms 111.478 ms
> 7
> lawrence-berkeley-national-laboratory.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net
> (2001:470:1:27f::2)
> [AS6939] 109.467 ms 109.452 ms 109.435 ms
> 8 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (2001:400:0:15a::1) [AS293] 115.929 ms
> 113.625 ms 115.896 ms
> 9 washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (2001:400:0:e0::2) [AS293] 114.606 ms
> 112.068 ms 112.045 ms
> 10 starsdn1-ip-washsdn2.es.net (2001:400:0:ab::1) [AS293] 126.783 ms
> 130.008 ms 126.747 ms
> 11 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (2001:400:0:a2::2) [AS293] 127.268 ms
> 124.223 ms 124.125 ms
> 12 anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (2001:400:0:c0::1) [AS293] 128.066 ms 130.529
> ms 130.513 ms
> 13 2001:400:2202:8::2 (2001:400:2202:8::2) [AS293] 130.976 ms 128.915 ms
> 128.892 ms
> 14 * * *
> 15 * * *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> root at server7:/home/anurag/tmp# wget -6
>
> http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
> --2012-04-11 21:45:52--
>
> http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
> Resolving mirror.anl.gov... 2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9
> Connecting to mirror.anl.gov|2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9|:80...
> connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 1644474368 (1.5G) [application/octet-stream]
> Saving to: `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso'
>
>
> 100%[============================================================================================================================>]
> 1,644,474,368 *3.66M/s in 6m 11s*
>
> 2012-04-11 21:52:04 (4.22 MB/s) - `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso' saved
> [1644474368/1644474368]
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Seth Mos <seth.mos at dds.nl> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Op 11 apr 2012, om 20:16 heeft Anurag Bhatia het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > > Also, does it makes sense to go for BGP Tunnel for now? I just setup
> IPv6
> > > Tunnel via Hurricane Electric. Latency seems pretty much OK ~ 10-15ms
> of
> > > overhead. Yet to test other parameters. I heard Tunnels are usually
> bad.
> > > Can someone tell how to test this tunnel setup to confirm if there is a
> > > performance issue or not? I am thinking of writing a quick bash script
> > and
> > > run via cron to test latency, packet loss and bandwidth throughput for
> > > couple of days. If anyone has better idea, please let me know.
> >
> > Also using a HE.net BGP tunnel for our IPv6, simply because having just 1
> > native provider with Ipv6 isn't redundant. That and it's 8mbit.
> >
> > The v4 connection which the tunnel connects over is 90mbit, and the
> tunnel
> > needs to travel from NL to DE for the FRA BGP peering.
> >
> > I'm getting about 40mbit through the IPv6 tunnel, so i'd say it works
> > well, although the throughput has slowly been dropping to the 30's range
> > over the last 6 months. But that's probably because of the latency.
> >
> > For something that is provided for free I'm really glad we have it.
> >
> > I should have peered with their UK PoP as it's much closer by latency,
> > thus faster.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Seth
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Anurag Bhatia
> anuragbhatia.com
> or simply - http://[2001:470:26:78f::5] if you are on IPv6 connected
> network!
>
> Twitter: @anurag_bhatia <https://twitter.com/#!/anurag_bhatia>
> Linkedin: http://linkedin.anuragbhatia.com
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list