SORBS?!

Fri Apr 6 16:18:59 UTC 2012

On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:55:35 -0400, Drew Weaver said:
> That is again, not true.
>
> Senderbase's listings don't correlate to any public information so it's pretty
> much impossible to pro-actively protect ourselves from having our IPs set to poor.

You missed the point - if it was industry standard practice, reputation lists
at Senderbase, Spamhaus, and SORBS would *all 3* be out of business, because
the average spammer's lifespan at a provider would be less than the time it
takes the average reputation list to put up an entry.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120406/c4e5f551/attachment.sig>