Cisco 7600 PFC3B(XL) and IPv6 packets with fragmentation header

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Fri Sep 30 20:48:44 CDT 2011


On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:
>> On Sep 30, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>>> this is exactly why punting anything NOT management and/or routing-protocols should be banned. Thanks for making that point explicitly.
>>
>> And this is the requirement which should be placed in RFPs, along with other specific requirements for ACL handling, flow telemetry functionality, uRPF, et. al.
>>
>> If folks want to influence vendors to do the Right Thing, they have to expend the time and effort to quantify and qualify said Right Thing(s), and then put it into RFP requirements.  Otherwise, complaining post-procurement isn't generally going to accomplish much.
>>
>
> yes, my bitchfest was also a 'could we all start asking for this, now?' ... :)
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list