Cisco 7600 PFC3B(XL) and IPv6 packets with fragmentation header
morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Fri Sep 30 16:31:15 UTC 2011
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
> Of course, if you wanted a 10g capable service provider router and didn't
> want an asr9k, they were pushing the 7600 because the 6500 is a switch and
> the 7600 is a router and the two are totally different, no really you've
> gotta believe it. But at least the rsp720 could handle ipv6 fragments better.
if I turn my head to the side I can almost believe you.
More information about the NANOG