Cisco 7600 PFC3B(XL) and IPv6 packets with fragmentation header

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at
Fri Sep 30 16:31:15 UTC 2011

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at> wrote:
> Of course, if you wanted a 10g capable service provider router and didn't
> want an asr9k, they were pushing the 7600 because the 6500 is a switch and
> the 7600 is a router and the two are totally different, no really you've
> gotta believe it.  But at least the rsp720 could handle ipv6 fragments better.

if I turn my head to the side I can almost believe you.

More information about the NANOG mailing list