Strange static route
jmaslak at antelope.net
Fri Sep 23 20:18:42 CDT 2011
Protection against learning a bad default route through whatever routing protocol they are learning, since these two routes would be more specific than any typical default route. They probably got burned learning a default route.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Glen Kent <glen.kent at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have seen a few operators adding static routes like:
> 0.0.0.0/1 some next-hop and
> 188.8.131.52/1 some next-hop.
> Why would anyone want to add such static routes? What does 0.0.0.0/1
> mean. Note that the netmask is 1 and not 0.
More information about the NANOG