Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Thu Sep 22 06:27:51 UTC 2011
On Sep 22, 2011, at 1:54 AM, PC wrote:
> An optimal solution would be a tiered system where the adjusted price only applies to traffic units over the price tier threshold and not retroactively to all traffic units.
Optimal for whom?
Also, I doubt you can make that claim as you do not know the costs or other business conditions of every deal.
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick at ianai.net>wrote:
> > If you have a lot more, you can negotiate tiers. E.g. The first 10G is
> > $X/Mbps, but if you hit 20G, you get charged 20000 * $Y (where Y < X,
> > obviously). This can lead to interesting situations where 19 Gbps costs
> > more than 20 Gbps. But dems da breaks.
> > --
> > TTFN,
> > patrick
> I knew of a place that used to push "fake" traffic over a link to ensure
> they were in the cheaper (higher) tier. Who knew business rules overriding
> engineering could result in non-optimal situations.
> Brandon Galbraith
> US Voice: 630.492.0464
More information about the NANOG