ouch..

Mark Gauvin MGauvin at dryden.ca
Wed Sep 14 18:35:28 CDT 2011


Nat444 or frontal labotomy hmm let's see at least with the second I  
would still be able to make a living as a micro soft network admin;)

Sent from my iPhone

On 2011-09-14, at 6:07 PM, "James Jones" <james at freedomnet.co.nz> wrote:

> On 9/14/11 2:46 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>> In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don  
>> Gould wrote:
>>> How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web  
>>> site?
>> Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...
>>
>>> * Does Juniper break promises?
>> Yes.
>>
>>> * Does Cisco break them?
>> Yes.
>>
>>> * What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper?
>> It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.
>>
>>> * What is the best technology for each company?
>> Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time.
>> Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.
>>
>>> * Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?
>> Yes, but I can't afford it.
>>
>> Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate  
>> even the
>> thought of NAT444?
>>
>> :) :) :)
>>
>
> Just the thought of NAT444 makes my stomach turn.
>
>
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list