ouch..

Wed Sep 14 21:46:51 UTC 2011

In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
> How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site?

Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...

> * Does Juniper break promises?

Yes.

> * Does Cisco break them?

Yes.

> * What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper?

It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.

> * What is the best technology for each company?

Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time.
Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.

> * Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?

Yes, but I can't afford it.

Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the
thought of NAT444?

:) :) :)

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110914/2c95de6d/attachment.sig>